How to comment on the SWLP

This is an extract from the Residents Association’s Regulation 19 representations on the South Warwickshire Local Plan.

The deadline for you to make comments is 8 September. You can write a letter or comment online at https://southwarwickshire.oc2.uk/document/168

Remember you have to challenge the draft plan because it is unlawful or unsound not because you don’t like it.

The website will try to get you to answer its prearranged questions. I suggest you choose the most relevant opportunity to comment and ignore the rest.

Do not repeat verbatim what I have written or copy/paste it. Put it in your own words. Although you are commenting on the SWLP website it will be read by the Planning Inspector.

“The proposal in the draft SWLP to remove Tanworth in Arden village and its much-valued Conservation area from the Green Belt is totally unjustifiable and consequently renders that part of the plan unsound.

The Arup Green Belt Reviews contain lots of subjective assertion regarding openness but very little evidence as to why removal of Tanworth is justified in terms of the revised 2026 NPPF GB3 para 1. Nor have any exceptional circumstances under GB1 been advanced.

Given its discrete location and its elevated position in totally unspoilt open countryside, Tanworth village should be cherished by the District Council – not singled out for harsh treatment. The draft document totally fails to make any case to justify its removal.

Such an act would not produce any appreciable planning gain in a beautiful village already 99% developed and otherwise largely protected.

On the contrary such a change of designation could harm the village’s unique setting by attracting unwelcome future development on its boundary.

The joining of the new Harrington development to the rest of the village could easily be achieved by a Built-Up Area Boundary Review or a revised NDP. No explanation has been forthcoming under GB1b as to why normal planning and development policies are thought inadequate.

We consider the draft plan unsound because it fails to consider other less harmful ways of solving any problems it has identified.”

(Source: Tom Ross)

Draft Local Plan Out to Consultation

Both Stratford District Council and Warwick District Council have now formally approved the draft South Warwickshire Local Plan and it has gone out to consultation – in planner speak Regulation 19 Consultation.

This process will run for a period of 7 weeks from Tuesday 21 July till midnight on Tuesday 8 September.

Any person or organisation may make “representations“. The key word is representations not comments.

So, unlike previous consultations, it is not about proposals you may like or dislike.

Representations have to be restricted to areas where you believe the proposed plan is “unsound” and contrary to legal or planning legislation.

In terms of Tanworth and the wider parish only the proposal to remove the village itself from Green Belt would seem to affect us. The Parish Council and the Association are seeking clarification on what this might mean practically.

However, when an Inspector comes finally to consider the plan at an Planning Inquiry early next year he or she may still decide it is “unsound” and ask both councils to consider proposals that were rejected by them at an earlier stage i.e. Danzey, etc.

(Source: Stratford District Council)

Police Apologise for Non-Attendance

Inspector Jake Kibblewhite of Warwickshire Police has written to the Association to apologise for the fact that there was no police presence at our AGM for the first time in over 40 years,

He has offered to attend our next meeting in person.

(Source: Tom Ross)

It’s Started Already!

If you attended our recent AGM you will have heard dire warnings that Stratford District, and Tanworth in particular, may be about to be snowed under by applications to build new housing on the Green Belt.

The government’s revised National Policy Planning Framework and some recent decisions in the High Court mean that only “preventing urban sprawl” between towns can be given as a legitimate reason to refuse planning applications – not between villages.

The government has also moved the goal posts on how a Five Year Housing Supply is calculated – to the detriment of Stratford District.

Summers Holdings Ltd have just submitted an application in principle for up to nine houses on land in Butts Lane. Others will surely follow.

Please take a moment to read the details, and especially the argument set out in the Planning Statement prepared by Stansgate Planners, on the SDC E-planning website – reference 26/00918/PIP.

More to follow.

(Source: Tom Ross)

No Police at Residents AGM

Many thanks to the residents who managed to make it to our Annual General Meeting on Wednesday 8 April.

Our MP Manuela Perteghella and District Councillor Lynda Organ attended and answered questions from the 60 strong audience. Unfortunately, our County Councillor James Crocker had to attend another meeting in Henley.

For the first time in forty years Warwickshire Police were unable to field anyone on the night. Given that “Neighbourhood Watch” is part of our name that is to be very much regretted.

The challenges facing Tanworth over the Green Belt, a Conservation Area review, speeding in the village and along Broad Lane and a possible major development at Portway have never been greater.

(Source: Tom Ross)

One Council….or Two?

The UK Government is in the process of re-organising local government in England.  It is encouraging the creation of new single-tier authorities to cover large areas of the country and, in most cases, sweeping away the existing County and District Councils. 

The government hopes this will deliver efficiencies and cost savings.

You may recall this was tried in the 1970’s and largely abandoned some years later.

The powers of Parish Councils may also change to some degree.

Both the existing Warwickshire County Council (with Rugby Borough Council) and Stratford District Council (with Warwick District Council) have produced proposals which could be said to augment their existing responsibilities.

As a result, residents are being asked if they prefer one new unitary authority to cover all of present Warwickshire OR two unitary authorities the southern of which would combine Stratford and Warwick District Councils.

More information about One Council can be found at:

https://www.warwickshire.gov.uk/lgrproposal

and about Two Councils at:

https://shapingourcouncils.co.uk/our-submission-document

Residents are asked to give their views by 26 March at:

https://consult.communities.gov.uk/local-government-reorganisation/warwickshire

(Source: Tom Ross)

Green Waste Charges

Stratford District Council has increased the charge for the collection of green waste to £50 from 1 April 2026.

Details of how to purchase a 2026/7 sticker for your Green Bin can be found on the District Council website.

(Source: Stratford District Council)

Conservation Area Review

Stratford District Council have confirmed that they are currently undertaking a review of the Tanworth Conservation Area.

They have hired consultants Essex Place Services to undertake the work. Residents may have encountered one of their number around the village,

It is not known yet why this work is being undertaken.

(Source: Tom Ross)

Parking in Tanworth Village Centre

Representations were made recently to Tanworth Parish Council regarding the shocking state of parking in the village centre. Among the suggestions was a Residents Parking Scheme with visitor parking time restricted.

Everyone is agreed that an already difficult situation is made worse when there are events in the School, the Church or the Village Hall. It is also accepted that parking is already under pressure because of the legitimate needs of the Bell and Tanworth Garage.

The Bellfield has also suffered for many years and the situation has only been made worse by the loss of the area near the lockup garages.

A small group of Parish Councillors, consisting of David Cowan, John Brougham and Tom Ross, met to discuss possible solutions.

The outcome was that, given the many downsides of parking restrictions in any part of the village, not least the cost and the effect on the Conservation Area, the Parish Council agreed at its meeting on 16 October not to ask Warwickshire County Council to progress such a scheme.

Councillors agreed that the only solution was to try to provide extra off street parking around the village. To this end the Council would approach Tanworth School to see if they could help more than they already do and to approach local landowners to see if any fields in the vicinity could be leased to provide more parking spaces on a regular basis.

Further details are available in the minutes of the Parish Council. The Clerk can be contacted on 703200.

(Source: Tom Ross)

Major Development for Portway?

Representatives from Caddick Group and Erdgard Developments have made a presentation to Tanworth Parish Council in advance of an application to build a large industrial site on land to the south east of Junction 3 of the M42.

You may be aware that a proposal to build a larger development over thirty years ago called Portway Business Park was only defeated after a long and hard fought campaign by the residents of Tanworth, Earlswood and Portway.

This is a very worrying development at a time when the government is keen to be seen as  business-friendly and the Green Belt is threatened by the recently revised National Policy Planning Framework.

A formal application has not been made yet, but the developers have undertaken to keep the Parish Council informed. 

If you would like more information when it becomes available please contact the Parish Clerk on 703200.




(Source: Tom Ross)